
The Jharkhand High Court has ruled that restoration proceedings under Section 71A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act must be initiated within a reasonable time, even though the law sets no time limit. A single judge, Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, also held that once a restoration order becomes final, it cannot be reopened in later proceedings.

The court set aside orders by the Additional Collector and Divisional Commissioner that had reopened a 1988 restoration order concerning 1.32 acres in Ranchi. Amar Kumar Choudhary, the petitioner, had complied with the 1988 order by transferring land. Citing Supreme Court rulings, the court said a delay of around 30 years is the outer reasonable limit and that res judicata applies.
This ruling quietly settles a practical puzzle: what happens when a land law has no time limit for claims? Some may call it a technicality, but the High Court gave a common-sense answer. Old orders cannot be endlessly attacked. For ordinary buyers, this brings certainty after decades. The real test is whether district officials will now stop entertaining such belated pleas. A single case does not change the habit of reopening settled titles. Watch how many similar appeals get dismissed this year.
Source: livelaw.in
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Ashin Xavier: interesting
IO Repro: Repro test v4 after fix 2 Oct. Safe to trash.
IO Repro: Repro test v3 after fix 2 Oct. Safe to trash.
IO Repro: Repro test after fix 2 Oct. Safe to trash.