SC asks Centre for statutory social media safeguards for minors

The Story in Brief

The Supreme Court on 28 September asked the Centre to examine whether a statutory framework can be created to ensure social media platforms comply with Indian laws governing minors, including the bar on children under 18 entering into contracts. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant heard a petition by the NGO Just Rights for Children Alliance, which argues that contracts minors sign when creating accounts are void under Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act. The court said safeguards must be incorporated into intermediary rules, not remain voluntary guidelines. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the bench that 'something can be done, something should be done and will be done'.

Supreme Court seeks framework for minors on social media

Separately, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has begun consultations to draft a Standard Operating Procedure for reporting child sexual abuse material online, after the court gave it a last opportunity to file a compliance report. The next hearing is on 15 October. Meta and Google have announced they will report such cases directly to Indian agencies instead of the US-based National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Social activists and advocates have also called for stricter laws on online access to pornographic content, with a memorandum to the Prime Minister seeking a dedicated law to prevent persons below 18 from accessing such content.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The coverage of the Supreme Court's direction is uniform across sources, with all outlets reporting the same core facts: the bench's call for statutory safeguards, the reliance on Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, and the Solicitor General's assurance. The Hindu adds a separate dimension by covering a press conference where activists called for stricter laws on pornographic content and a blanket ban on minors using social media, as done in Australia, which is not reported elsewhere. The Morung Express and Nagaland Post carry statements from NGOs welcoming the court's move, providing a civil society perspective. The balanced reading is that the court has set the process in motion, with the Centre examining the issue and a hearing scheduled for 15 October.

Coverage: 8 sources, 7 neutral, 1 sensationalist


Sources (8): rediff.com (neutral report), hindustantimes.com (neutral report), livemint.com (neutral report), ndtvprofit.com (neutral report), thehindu.com (sensationalist), morungexpress.com (neutral report), nagalandpost.com (neutral report), morungexpress.com (2) (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 8 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.

Update, 2 October 2026: this story now draws on 8 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.