NCLAT upholds SFIO power to seek asset disgorgement in IL and FS case

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed appeals by audit firm BSR and Associates LLP and its former partner N Sampath Ganesh, upholding the authority of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) to seek disgorgement of assets in a case linked to IL and FS Securities Services Ltd. The tribunal rejected arguments that SFIO could not file such applications as it would create a conflict of roles, terming the contention 'completely baseless.'

NCLAT upholds SFIO power to seek disgorgement in IL&FS case

The appellants had challenged a March 2026 NCLT order, arguing SFIO lacked the power to file for asset attachment under the Companies Act. The NCLAT held that the disgorgement petition was filed in the name of the Union of India, not SFIO, and the decision to proceed was the central government's. SFIO was merely authorised to present the petition, the bench comprising Justice Yogesh Khanna and technical members Barun Mitra and Ajai Das Mehrotra said.

The dispute originates from a 2018 government order for an SFIO probe into IL and FS and its subsidiaries. SFIO submitted its report in July 2023, and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs authorised SFIO's Director to pursue proceedings in September 2023. The NCLAT ruling affirms that civil and criminal liability arising from such investigations remains subject to determination by the appropriate court or tribunal.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Both sources provide straight factual reporting of separate court rulings with no discernible slant. The Economic Times piece focuses on the NCLAT's legal reasoning upholding SFIO's powers, while LiveLaw covers the Delhi High Court dismissing a PIL on IFCI's NSE share divestment due to suppression of facts. The common thread is judicial scrutiny of corporate governance cases. The key implication is that courts are reinforcing procedural discipline, whether on SFIO's authority or on PIL litigants' candour. The Delhi High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs, a significant deterrent against forum shopping.

Note: The two sources cover different cases. Source 1 is the IL and FS matter, Source 2 is the IFCI-NSE divestment PIL. Both are neutral reports of distinct judicial outcomes.

Coverage: 2 sources, 2 neutral


Sources (2): legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com (neutral report), livelaw.in (neutral report)

This brief was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above, so one read covers every framing they carry. Methodology and corrections.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Sign in to comment

Comments are open to readers with an Indian Opinion account. We email you a 6-digit code; there is no password.

Sign in to comment

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.