Ola Electric Q1: Brokerages flag weak volumes, cash burn

Ola Electric Q1 Review: Brokerages Flag Weak Volumes, Cash Burn — Check Target Price

Ola Electric’s June quarter results drew a mixed response from brokerages, with most retaining cautious or sell ratings. Goldman Sachs maintained 'Neutral' with a target of Rs 40, while Kotak and Citi…

The Story in Brief

Ola Electric’s June quarter results drew a mixed response from brokerages, with most retaining cautious or sell ratings. Goldman Sachs maintained 'Neutral' with a target of Rs 40, while Kotak and Citi kept 'Sell' at targets of Rs 20 and Rs 26 respectively, citing weak volumes, lower average selling prices and continued cash burn. Emkay Global also retained 'Sell' at Rs 30, flagging rising competition from TVS, Bajaj and Ather.

Ola Electric faces broker sell calls after weak Q1 volumes, cash burn

The company’s net loss narrowed 22% year-on-year to Rs 336 crore, but revenue fell 45% to Rs 455 crore. Deliveries doubled sequentially to 39,192 units, though still far below the 68,192 units a year ago. Market share recovered to 8.3% from 5% in Q4, but slipped to around 6.5% in July, brokerages noted. Free cash flow remained negative at Rs 351 crore.

Ola Electric faces broker sell calls after weak Q1 volumes, cash burn

The Indian Opinion

The narrative that Ola Electric is 'back' ignores a stark fact: revenue is still down 45% from last year, and the volume recovery is from a very low base. Sequential improvement is being treated as a turnaround when it is merely a lifeline. Brokerages are right to flag cash burn and competitive intensity from Bajaj, TVS and Ather. The real test is not a single quarter of doubled deliveries, but whether Ola can sustain market share above 10% while meaningfully reducing operating losses. Watch the July registration data, it will tell the story better than any earnings call.


Sources (4): ndtvprofit.com, businesstoday.in, inc42.com, thehindubusinessline.com

This story was synthesised by AI from the 4 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 4 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.