
India's protected domestic market and weak competitive federalism discourage private-sector investment in research and development, argues an opinion piece in Nikkei Asia. The article notes that despite India's high-tech hub Bengaluru, top…
India's protected domestic market and weak competitive federalism discourage private-sector investment in research and development, argues an opinion piece in Nikkei Asia. The article notes that despite India's high-tech hub Bengaluru, top companies such as Tata, Reliance, and Adani spend negligible amounts on R&D compared to global peers. India's gross domestic expenditure on R&D is around 0.64% of GDP, far below China's 2.4% and the US's 3.5%.
The piece criticises the 'race to the bottom' among states, which compete on tax breaks rather than innovation infrastructure. It also states that the government's small-scale industry reservations and import tariffs shield firms from global competition, reducing the incentive to innovate. The author suggests that without dismantling protections and fostering R&D-linked state competition, India's knowledge economy ambitions will stall.
The single source, a Nikkei Asia opinion piece, is uniformly critical of India's private-sector R&D investment. It frames India's protected domestic market and a weak 'competitive federalism' model as structural disincentives for innovation, potentially underplaying government efforts like the production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme. The article is government-critical, attributing the R&D gap to policy failures rather than corporate risk aversion. A careful reader should note that the piece is an op-ed, not a news report, and that recent PLI-linked R&D increments may be omitted from its argument. The key open question is whether India's National Research Foundation, announced in the 2023 budget, will shift corporate behaviour.
Coverage: 1 source, 1 government-critical
Source: asia.nikkei.com (government critical)
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.