
The Supreme Court on Thursday sharply criticised the Centre and the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) for failing to introduce mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on packaged foods high in…
The Supreme Court on Thursday sharply criticised the Centre and the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) for failing to introduce mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on packaged foods high in sugar, salt and saturated fat. A bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran warned it would issue further directions if the government did not act, and questioned whether the government wanted citizens to remain healthy, especially children. The court was hearing a public interest litigation highlighting that non-communicable diseases now cause over 6 million deaths each year in India.

Additional Solicitor General Brijender Chahar argued that strict labels could force traditional items like namkeen to carry red warnings, and that international standards may not fit Indian dietary habits. The court rejected this, saying commercial interests cannot trump public health and that consumers have the right to make informed choices. The government has been given two weeks to finalise its decision.
The government's claim that front-of-pack labels would unfairly brand traditional Indian foods like namkeen is a weak excuse for inaction. Non-communicable diseases already kill over 6 million Indians each year, and diabetes affects nearly one in four. The real question is whether FSSAI is weighing industry lobbying against a child's right to know what is in that packet of Kurkure. Watch for the two-week deadline: will the Centre finally put public health ahead of commercial interests?
Sources (2): economictimes.indiatimes.com, greaterkashmir.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.