
The Supreme Court has given the Centre two weeks to decide the visual format of front-of-package warning labels for packaged foods. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and K Vinod Chandran criticised…
The Supreme Court has given the Centre two weeks to decide the visual format of front-of-package warning labels for packaged foods. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and K Vinod Chandran criticised the delay and rejected the Union government’s claim that matching international packaging standards would be difficult. The court cited systems used in Chile, Israel and Canada and said labels should use clear indicators, words, numbers or symbols.

The court said front-of-package labelling could help consumers understand levels of sugar, salt and saturated fats, particularly children increasingly consuming junk food. It also linked the right to health with Articles 21 and 47. The case, filed by 3S and Our Health Society, will be heard again on September 10.

The loudest claims will either present warning labels as a cure for obesity or dismiss them as needless regulation. Neither is supported by this hearing. Clear labels can improve information, but healthier diets also depend on prices, access, advertising and enforcement. The practical test is whether the final design is easy to read and whether FSSAI can enforce it consistently across products. Will consumers actually spot and understand the warnings?
Sources (2): indiatoday.in, timesnownews.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.