
The Supreme Court on Thursday said it would not impose a blanket ban on pellet guns as long as existing police regulations allow their use in exceptional circumstances for crowd control. A…
The Supreme Court on Thursday said it would not impose a blanket ban on pellet guns as long as existing police regulations allow their use in exceptional circumstances for crowd control. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant told a petition seeking a complete ban that the prayer was vague and that petitioners must first challenge the police rules permitting pellet guns. The court was hearing a plea by former IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad and two victims injured by pellets during a July 20 protest at Jantar Mantar over the NEET paper leak.
The court said it was willing to examine specific incidents of misuse on a case-by-case basis. It directed the Delhi government to provide the best treatment to injured petitioners Prashant Kumar Singh and Sheikh Irshad Mansoori. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was asked to produce the standard operating procedures for crowd control. The court also ordered preservation of logs and ammunition records of the RAF unit deployed on July 20. The bench questioned the lack of protective gear for police, saying it would give them time to pause before using force.
The SC is right to reject a blanket ban on pellet guns, policing is hard, and graded response matters. But the real story is the absence of a clear, public rulebook. The Centre must now produce the standing orders for when and how pellets are used. If no protocol exists, or if it permits metallic pellets in crowd control, the Article 21 challenge will be unavoidable. The July 20 ammunition log will settle whether the RAF followed law or fired at will.
Sources (2): thehansindia.com, thehindu.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.