Supreme Court extends cruelty law to live-in relationships akin to marriage

Editorial: Protecting rights of live-in couples

The Supreme Court has ruled that women in live-in relationships 'in the nature of marriage' can seek protection from cruelty under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, corresponding to Sections 85…

The Story in Brief

The Supreme Court has ruled that women in live-in relationships 'in the nature of marriage' can seek protection from cruelty under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, corresponding to Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The August 3 judgment in Lokesh BH versus State of Karnataka (2026) held that denying protection merely because a couple did not formally marry would violate Article 14 (Right to Equality). However, protection extends only if the partners had a clear intention to marry.

Supreme Court extends cruelty law to live-in relationships akin to marriage

The court invoked the KV Puttaswamy judgment on privacy to argue that lack of legal recognition for live-in relationships should not deny protection. Both criminal law under Section 498-A and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 now apply to such relationships. Telangana Today notes this brings criminal law in step with evolving social realities, while India Today reports the ruling also requires proving intention to marry, a subjective element that could limit its application.

The Indian Opinion

Media cheer for this judgment is deafening, but the real test is whether Indian society accepts the court's logic of intent-to-marry. The ruling demands proof of intention to marry for Section 498-A protection, a subjective standard that invites litigation over what counts as 'future intent'. Abusive partners can still claim the relationship was casual, not marriage-like. Watch for the first few cases where women allege cruelty but lack a written promise of marriage. Will the courts apply the same purposive interpretation then, or retreat into formalism?


Sources (2): telanganatoday.com, indiatoday.in

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.