
The 16th Finance Commission, chaired by Arvind Panagariya for 2026-31, has retained States’ share of divisible Union taxes at 41% but proposed a sharp restructuring of grants. Its report recommends Rs 9.47…
The 16th Finance Commission, chaired by Arvind Panagariya for 2026-31, has retained States’ share of divisible Union taxes at 41% but proposed a sharp restructuring of grants. Its report recommends Rs 9.47 lakh crore in grants, down from Rs 10.1 lakh crore under the 15th Finance Commission. Their share of total transfers would fall from 19.4% to 8.3%.
The Hindu’s editorial says the Commission would end revenue deficit, sector-specific and State-specific grants, retaining grants mainly for local bodies and disaster management. It argues that this efficiency-focused approach could weaken fiscal equalisation, especially for States such as Kerala, Punjab, hill States and the north-east, whose national contributions or structural costs are not fully captured by formula-based devolution.
The lazy narrative is that States demanding more funds simply want to avoid fiscal discipline. The opposite claim, that every central transfer is automatically an entitlement, is just as weak. The real test is whether the new system protects States with genuine structural costs while discouraging wasteful borrowing. The Centre’s treatment of cesses and surcharges will be as important as the 41% devolution figure. Will non-shareable levies actually be reduced?
Source: thehindu.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.