
The Allahabad High Court has dismissed four petitions filed by an advocate seeking Rs 4.8 crore in pending professional fees from the Uttar Pradesh government. A Division Bench of Justice Shekhar B Saraf and Justice Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary held that a writ petition for recovery of professional fees is not maintainable, as the engagement was contractual and involved disputed questions of fact.

The petitioner claimed he represented the State as a special counsel for 16 years and was entitled to Rs 5 lakh per case for 96 cases under a 2011 government order. The State opposed this, arguing that the order applied only to special counsel outside the panel and that the petitioner's fee as a panel lawyer was only Rs 1,800 per case. The Court noted the government never admitted the dues and that the 2011 order did not fix a maximum fee of Rs 5 lakh for all cases.
The Bench deprecated the State for compelling the counsel to approach the court, observing that fee disputes between a lawyer and client erode trust. However, it emphasised that lawyers should not drag clients to court over fees. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to approach a competent civil court for adjudication.
Source: barandbench.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above. Methodology and corrections.