
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the right to life under Article 21 requires the state to actively prevent stampedes at large religious gatherings. In a case related to Mathura-Vrindavan events,…
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the right to life under Article 21 requires the state to actively prevent stampedes at large religious gatherings. In a case related to Mathura-Vrindavan events, the court said institutionalising the science of crowd behaviour in academia, administration, and policy is a "constitutional imperative."

In separate decisions, the court held that a murder conviction cannot be based solely on "last seen together" evidence unless every link in the circumstantial chain is proved. It also ruled that disputed signatures on a photocopy cannot be sent for handwriting examination without producing the original document.

The Allahabad High Court's push for crowd behaviour science is welcome but raises a practical question. Indian courts have made many such progressive directions, on prisons, pollution, or roads, that stay on paper. The blunt fact is: India has no credible national database of crowd incidents, nor an academic department studying them. Until a university actually starts a course or a ministry funds a pilot study, this remains a good idea without teeth.
Sources (2): livelaw.in, livelaw.in (2)
This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.
Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.