Supreme Court quashes post-facto green clearance order

Supreme court upholds centre’s power to notify post-facto clearance

The Supreme Court on July 29 struck down the 2021 executive order that allowed post-facto environmental clearances for projects that started without prior approval. The three-judge bench held the office memorandum unconstitutional,…

The Story in Brief

The Supreme Court on July 29 struck down the 2021 executive order that allowed post-facto environmental clearances for projects that started without prior approval. The three-judge bench held the office memorandum unconstitutional, but said the Centre can issue statutory amnesty schemes under the Environment Protection Act, 1986. Existing clearances granted under both the 2017 and 2021 schemes remain valid.

Supreme Court upholds centre's power to notify post-facto clearance

Environmental groups called the ruling a dilution of environmental law, while the court noted the OM equated compliant and defiant projects. The judgment prospectively ends the post-facto clearance regime, but opens a statutory route for regularisation. Activists argue this could encourage lawlessness unless strictly limited.

Supreme Court upholds centre's power to notify post-facto clearance

The Indian Opinion

Environmentalists call this a dilution, industry groups see a relief, but neither is fully right. The court struck down the 2021 order that made regularisation routine, yet left the Centre free to craft statutory amnesty under the EPA. The real test is whether any new notification sets narrow, time-bound exceptions or becomes a permanent backdoor. Watch what the government files next and whether it imposes strict conditions beyond penalties.


Sources (2): india.mongabay.com, hindustantimes.com

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Updated: this story now draws on 2 sources.

Ask their opinion on this story
They have read this article, our coverage, and the web.
AI simulations of historical figures. Responses are generated from the historical record, not authentic statements.

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Share your opinion

Loading Next Post...
Search Trending
Ask their opinion
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

All fields are required.