
A new study from The Ohio State University suggests that using screens to calm young children could be linked to their cognitive development. The research, led by Jane Shawcroft and published in…
A new study from The Ohio State University suggests that using screens to calm young children could be linked to their cognitive development. The research, led by Jane Shawcroft and published in the Journal of Communication, examined data from Project M.E.D.I.A., which followed children from around 2.5 to 7.5 years of age. For most children, researchers found a two-way or 'cyclical' relationship: a child's ability to regulate emotions influenced how often a parent used a screen to calm them, and that use in turn affected the child's developing executive functions like cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control.
For a small group of children (roughly 7% of the sample), screen use appeared to affect cognitive skills, but the children's skills did not predict screen use by parents. Times Now reports that parents in this group were more likely to report higher levels of depression. Shawcroft said parent mental health is a 'strong predictor' of how they use technology with kids. She calls for more societal support and alternatives to screens, not parental blame.
This study is a useful corrective to the lazy binary that screens are either poison or harmless. The real story is more nuanced: context and parental wellbeing matter hugely. Shawcroft's finding that parent depression predicts a one-way pattern of screen use deserves more attention than it will get. The test for parents is not how much screen time, but how the child reacts when it ends. Frequent meltdowns after screen removal signal a pattern worth rethinking. Blaming parents without addressing their lack of support is the real dead end.
Source: timesnownews.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.