
The draft National Food Security (Amendment) Bill, 2026 proposes replacing the flat 35 kg per Antyodaya Anna Yojana household with 7 kg per person, capped at 35 kg. This would cut support…
The draft National Food Security (Amendment) Bill, 2026 proposes replacing the flat 35 kg per Antyodaya Anna Yojana household with 7 kg per person, capped at 35 kg. This would cut support for 84.5% of Tamil Nadu's AAY households, those with fewer than five members, reducing the state's monthly allocation by 35.6%. The share of households unable to afford a healthy diet has halved from 52% to 25% since 2011-12, yet crores remain vulnerable. India also faces a double burden: child stunting has fallen but wasting is stagnant, and 101 million adults have diabetes. The article argues against cutting grain entitlements and calls for dietary diversification alongside.
Both sides of the food security debate risk oversimplifying. Slashing entitlements without protecting small AAY households would hurt the most vulnerable, especially the elderly and disabled. Yet treating any reform as an attack on the poor ignores the need to fix inequity and the double burden of malnutrition. The real test is whether the government preserves the existing 35 kg floor while funding dietary diversification, and whether it recalculates the beneficiary ceiling after Census 2027. Without that, the debate remains stuck between slogans.
Source: thehindu.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.