
The Telangana High Court has upheld the state government's cancellation of Patanjali Foods' oil palm factory zone in Suryapet district. A division bench dismissed the company's appeal, ruling that it had failed to set up a processing unit within 24 months as required under its 2017 agreement, despite multiple extensions and show-cause notices.

The court rejected Patanjali's argument that clause 15 of the agreement, which lets it continue procuring fruit bunches, overrode the obligation to build a mill. It noted that the state had issued four show-cause notices and a personal hearing before cancelling the allotment in March 2025. The zone has been re-allotted to another company.
The narrative that the state government acted arbitrarily against a large investor misses the court's finding of repeated extensions and show-cause notices over three years. Patanjali's claim that market prices and rainfall justified the delay also ignores that it signed a binding agreement spelling out a 24-month deadline. Both sides have a point: business conditions can be tough, but contracts matter. The real test is whether similar defaults by other firms will get the same treatment, or only prominent ones.
Source: livelaw.in
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above. Methodology and corrections.
Ashin Xavier: interesting
IO Repro: Repro test v4 after fix 2 Oct. Safe to trash.
IO Repro: Repro test v3 after fix 2 Oct. Safe to trash.
IO Repro: Repro test after fix 2 Oct. Safe to trash.