
Delhi High Court Justice Prathiba M Singh has questioned the Supreme Court's proposal to make lawyers disclose their use of artificial intelligence in court filings. Speaking at the International ADR Conference 2026,…
Delhi High Court Justice Prathiba M Singh has questioned the Supreme Court's proposal to make lawyers disclose their use of artificial intelligence in court filings. Speaking at the International ADR Conference 2026, she said the requirement could increase compliance work without improving accountability, according to a Bar & Bench report. “I think disclosure norms is just going to make lawyers’ life more difficult,” she argued, noting that lawyers already deal with OCR and electronic filing requirements.
Justice Singh pointed to India's adversarial legal system as a check against inaccurate AI-generated material, where opposing counsel can challenge fabricated content. She supported AI use with human verification, calling it “an absolute disaster” without it. She cited cases where non-existent judgments or AI-drafted rulings reached courts. Singh also called for the judiciary to build its own AI platform for sensitive matters, and suggested live-transcription systems as a more immediate need for district courts.
The Supreme Court's draft rules on AI disclosure aim to curb hallucinated citations, but they risk creating templated affidavits that lawyers sign without thought. Justice Singh rightly flags this burden on practitioners already swamped with e-filing norms. Yet the real worry is not paperwork, it is judges relying on unchecked AI outputs, as seen in the GST case with fake rulings. The test will be whether the court narrows the disclosure rule to a simple certification of verified citations, as the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association proposed. Can trust be legislated into a template?n
Source: medianama.com
This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.